#958: Fol. 161r_1 - alume jameni

opened by ps2270

@TillmannTaape We seem to have corrected alume jameni to alum<corr>in</corr>e jameni. That is not correct, is it? Isn't the name of the substance alumen jamenum, thus, if we just leave it as is (i.e., no corrections), it will be ok, right?

If you agree, please go ahead and delete <corr> tags in the tcn and tl. Let me know if you don't agree. It's in the glossary. thanks!


TillmannTaape commented:

I agree, and have taken out the "correction" in tcn and tl.