To be completed after @ps2270 has completed her second pass through the comments

To do: - pull complete list of comment anchors from xml files - check that anchors have been entered correctly (no well-formedness errors, etc) - identify comments that should be deleted (from tacking sheet) to then - identify anchors that should be removed - create list of anchors used more than once with their location (ie folio)

I have completed my revision of comments. I've tried to highlight (yellow) all that need attention (most of them the sic/markup issues, but I have NOT highlighted all of these!) There are still a very few in orange, which I can't locate or otherwise couldn't decide about. I've tried to institute the correct format for the ed comments: i.e., when it is more than a few words, I've capitalized the first letter and put a period at the end. And, I've made a stab at marking up italicized text, but did not finish it all. We have some outstanding issues on which to decide:

947

771

941

• As soon as everyone weighs in on these, I'll attempt to make decisions.
• In addition, we have some comments that Marc needs to decide about. It is not clear to me whether anyone has given him a list of issues he needs to answer??
• I believe CAG is still working on bibliography/titles? I don't quite understand whether the machine-readable titles that are part of the bibliography will already be linked to these comments at the Edition's initial release?