#753: 140r-v repetition of word

opened by thuchacz

Marc thinks we should <corr><del> one of the "graver". Have we done this before in such a situation?


TillmannTaape commented:

Yes we have, see e.g. fol. 19r (repeated "de fer"). I've <corr><del> the second "graver" (on 140v) in the TCN, and deleted it in the TL.