There has been inconsistent use of <man>s, <rub>s, and <captions>, particularly in their relation to entries.
In creating an index of entries, should these be included? Decision from #12 is that <man>s should not. Need decision for <rub>s and <captions>.
@tcatapano, can you pull a list of all <rub>s and <captions> with their folio occurrences? THEN, M&K team go through this list and decide if they are correctly assigned these designation or if they should not instead be entries (rather than <rub>s and <captions>).
Then decide whether <rub>s and <captions> should be listed in the entries page somehow anyway?
Once decisions have been made, the following from issue #12 should be either removed from Index Tracking, or Index Tracking should be updated with additional rubs and captions:
Div ID | Folio # | Entry title transcription -- | -- | -- rub | p108v | Lardille rub | p108v | Alum de plume rub - marginal note instead? | p028v | Va au cinquiesme foeillet caption - listed in entry list? | p026r | Balle de canon caption - listed in entry list? | p026v | Balle de couleuvrine caption - listed in entry list? | p027r | Balle de bastarde caption - listed in entry list? | p027r | Balle de moyene caption - listed in entry list? | p027r | Piece de campagne caption - listed in entry list? | p027v | Faulconeau caption - listed in entry list? | p027v | Faulconeau de 4 quintals autrement passevolants tire 8 pans caption - listed in entry list? | p027v | 3 quintals tire de long 9 pans caption - listed in entry list? | p027v | 2 quintals tire de long une cane qui sont 8 pans de monpelier caption - listed in entry list? | p027v | 1 quintal tire six pans et demy caption - listed in entry list? | p027v | 1 quintal et demy tire 7 pans et demy caption - listed in entry list? | p027v | mousquet de 60 livres tire 5 pans de long ou 6 caption - listed in entry list? | p027v | 5 quintals tire onze pans et demy